globalchange  > 科学计划与规划
DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2017.1421520
Scopus记录号: 2-s2.0-85043373812
论文题名:
‘This was different’: transferring climate mitigation knowledge practices south to south with the MAPS programme
作者: Kane L; , Boulle M
刊名: Climate Policy
ISSN: 1469-3062
EISSN: 1752-7457
出版年: 2018
起始页码: 1
结束页码: 12
语种: 英语
英文关键词: Climate change mitigation ; co-production ; knowledge transfer ; MAPS ; southern theory ; south–south
Scopus学科分类: nvironmental Science: General Environmental Science ; Earth and Planetary Sciences: Atmospheric Science
英文摘要: This article is a case study of the Mitigation Action Plans and Scenarios programme (MAPS) which worked in climate change mitigation and development policy-making spaces in Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Peru and South Africa from 2010–2015. The MAPS programme was focused on achieving change in the commitment of southern decision makers to mitigate against climate change through government-mandated, stakeholder processes which generated evidence making a case for a low carbon transition. The article draws on reflective materials generated in the last year of the project. The value of MAPS was found in the well-tested data and evidence-driven scenario building; locally specific and country-driven processes; a culture of knowledge sharing through facilitated communities of practice; the role of professional facilitation in process design and in conducting stakeholder processes; shared experiences of working in the south, and particularly with cultural differences and conflict; and new ways of working south–south with each other, and with donors. These MAPS programme experiences stood in contrast to previous north–south knowledge sharing involvements. Theoretically, the article asks whether MAPS represents southern theory-making (after Connell, 2007). It concludes that through the action-oriented, facilitated co-production way of working on climate change in the south, MAPS represents an understanding of southern theory that challenges the orthodoxy of global knowledge production. MAPS emphasizes the need for theorizing in, and of, the south, and connecting policy and practices. Key policy insightsClimate change mitigation work in the south faces poorly resourced, fragmented, under-capacitated governance structures, often in conflicted settings.Given conflicted settings, skilled facilitation is an integral part of knowledge-making processes.Strong local communities of practice, who undertake learning-by-doing and are connected to ‘stubborn’ development realities, are also key to knowledge-making.Intentional co-production of data and evidence enable peer-to-peer learning and the trust-building which is vital to strong communities of practice. © 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group
Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/80203
Appears in Collections:科学计划与规划

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.


作者单位: Centre for Transport Studies, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa; Energy Research Centre, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa

Recommended Citation:
Kane L,, Boulle M. ‘This was different’: transferring climate mitigation knowledge practices south to south with the MAPS programme[J]. Climate Policy,2018-01-01
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Kane L]'s Articles
[, Boulle M]'s Articles
百度学术
Similar articles in Baidu Scholar
[Kane L]'s Articles
[, Boulle M]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[Kane L]‘s Articles
[, Boulle M]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.