globalchange  > 科学计划与规划
DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2017.1412934
Scopus记录号: 2-s2.0-85038360967
论文题名:
The impact of the US retreat from the Paris Agreement: Kyoto revisited?
作者: Pickering J; , McGee J; S; , Stephens T; , Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen S; I
刊名: Climate Policy
ISSN: 1469-3062
EISSN: 1752-7457
出版年: 2017
起始页码: 1
结束页码: 10
语种: 英语
英文关键词: Kyoto Protocol ; Paris Agreement ; treaty withdrawal ; United States of America
Scopus学科分类: nvironmental Science: General Environmental Science ; Earth and Planetary Sciences: Atmospheric Science
英文摘要: The United States’ decision to withdraw from the Paris Agreement (pending possible re-engagement under different terms) may have significant ramifications for international climate policy, but the implications of this decision remain contested. This commentary illustrates how comparative analysis of US participation in multilateral environmental agreements can inform predictions and future assessments of the decision. We compare and contrast US non-participation in the Kyoto Protocol and the Paris Agreement, focusing on four key areas that may condition the influence of US treaty decisions on international climate policy: (i) global momentum on climate change mitigation; (ii) the possibility of US non-participation giving rise to alternative forms of international collaboration on climate policy; (iii) the timing and circumstances of the US decision to exit; and (iv) the influence of treaty design on countries’ incentives to participate and comply. We find that differences across the two treaties relating to the first three factors are more likely to reduce the negative ramifications of US withdrawal from the Paris Agreement compared to the Kyoto Protocol. However, the increased urgency of deep decarbonization renders US non-participation a major concern despite its declining share of global emissions. Moreover, key design features of the Paris Agreement suggest that other countries may react to the US decision by scaling back their levels of ambition and compliance, even if they remain in the Agreement. Key policy insightsIncreasing global momentum on mitigation since 1997 means that US withdrawal from the Paris Agreement is potentially less damaging than its non-participation in the Kyoto ProtocolDespite the declining US share of global emissions, greater urgency of deep decarbonization means that the non-participation of a major player, such as the US, remains problematic for global cooperation and achieving the Paris Agreement’s goalsDifferences in the design of the Kyoto Protocol and Paris Agreement suggest that US non-participation is more likely to prompt reluctant countries to stay within the Paris framework but reduce levels of ambition and compliance, rather than exit the Agreement altogether © 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group
Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/80220
Appears in Collections:科学计划与规划

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.


作者单位: Centre for Deliberative Democracy and Global Governance, Institute for Governance and Policy Analysis, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia; Faculty of Law, Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, Centre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia; University of Sydney Law School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Public Administration Policy Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, Netherlands

Recommended Citation:
Pickering J,, McGee J,S,et al. The impact of the US retreat from the Paris Agreement: Kyoto revisited?[J]. Climate Policy,2017-01-01
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Pickering J]'s Articles
[, McGee J]'s Articles
[S]'s Articles
百度学术
Similar articles in Baidu Scholar
[Pickering J]'s Articles
[, McGee J]'s Articles
[S]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[Pickering J]‘s Articles
[, McGee J]‘s Articles
[S]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.