| DOI: | 10.1080/14693062.2017.1302918
|
| Scopus记录号: | 2-s2.0-85017257393
|
| 论文题名: | Transparency of action and support in the Paris Agreement |
| 作者: | Winkler H; , Mantlana B; , Letete T
|
| 刊名: | Climate Policy
|
| ISSN: | 1469-3062
|
| EISSN: | 1752-7457
|
| 出版年: | 2017
|
| 卷: | 17, 期:7 | | 起始页码: | 853
|
| 结束页码: | 872
|
| 语种: | 英语
|
| 英文关键词: | Adaptation
; capacity building
; differentiation
; measurable
; Paris Agreement
; reportable and verifiable (MRV)
; transparency
|
| Scopus关键词: | capacity building
; emission inventory
; environmental policy
; greenhouse gas
; guideline
; international agreement
; policy analysis
; policy approach
|
| Scopus学科分类: | nvironmental Science: General Environmental Science
; Earth and Planetary Sciences: Atmospheric Science
|
| 英文摘要: | The transparency framework under Article 13 of the Paris Agreement further enhances existing arrangements, in which commitments and actions were ‘measurable, reportable, and verifiable’ (MRV). Locating itself in the earlier MRV literature, the article examines the Paris transparency framework comprehensively, while deepening analysis of key aspects: differentiation, common modalities, procedures, and guidelines (MPG), adaptation, support, and technical expert review. The article illustrates the shifts from MRV to the Paris Agreement enhanced transparency framework. The transparency framework is characterized neither as ‘common’ nor ‘differentiated’, but includes common MPG, underpinned by built-in flexibility and continuous capacity building. Informational requirements on action are common, whereas those in relation to support are differentiated. The Paris Agreement established mandatory requirements to report regularly GHG inventories and information to track progress on implementing and achieving nationally determined contributions. Information on both mitigation and support is subject to technical expert review, which operationally may combine the work of expert review teams and technical teams of experts. The article considers implications for further work at the domestic and international levels. Policy relevance The enhanced transparency framework on action and support is central to the Paris Agreement, adding mandatory components of review. The transition from MRV to transparency should bear in mind existing arrangements. Expert review teams and technical teams of experts could be combined. The scope of transparency includes adaptation, and methodological work needed. Domestic institutional arrangements remain key, requiring continuous support for capacity. © 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. |
| Citation statistics: |
|
| 资源类型: | 期刊论文
|
| 标识符: | http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/80254
|
| Appears in Collections: | 科学计划与规划
|
|
There are no files associated with this item.
|
|
作者单位: | Energy Research Centre, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa; Department of Environmental Affairs, Pretoria, South Africa
|
| Recommended Citation: | |
Winkler H,, Mantlana B,, Letete T. Transparency of action and support in the Paris Agreement[J]. Climate Policy,2017-01-01,17(7)
|
|
|