globalchange  > 科学计划与规划
DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2016.1202096
Scopus记录号: 2-s2.0-84980409637
论文题名:
REDD+ finance: policy making in the context of fragmented institutions
作者: Well M; , Carrapatoso A
刊名: Climate Policy
ISSN: 1469-3062
EISSN: 1752-7457
出版年: 2017
卷: 17, 期:6
起始页码: 687
结束页码: 707
语种: 英语
英文关键词: climate regime ; financial mechanisms ; institutional framework ; international cooperation ; REDD ; UNFCCC
Scopus关键词: deforestation ; emission control ; environmental degradation ; environmental economics ; finance ; institutional framework ; international cooperation ; policy making ; United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
Scopus学科分类: nvironmental Science: General Environmental Science ; Earth and Planetary Sciences: Atmospheric Science
英文摘要: This article analyses the current institutional architecture of international finance for REDD+ (reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation, and the role of conservation, sustainable management of forests and enhancement of forest carbon stocks in developing countries) and aims at a better understanding of the complementary or contradictory nature of existing funding mechanisms. Through the integration of REDD+ into the Paris Agreement of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), the scene is set for countries to use this political legitimacy and momentum to further REDD+ implementation. How REDD+ is and will be financed is still a defining question for its successful implementation. This study shows that the heterogeneity of international financial support for REDD+ is an illustrative case for the phenomenon of institutional fragmentation. It explores to what extent the current setting of REDD+ finance can be seen as a rational response to earlier governance challenges, and whether a setting of co-governing institutions may evolve towards a functional differentiation of governance tasks. By discussing the specific case of REDD+ finance in Indonesia, the possible feedback effects of institutional fragmentation at the national level are also considered. The study finds that a strengthened coordination of the existing financing efforts is decisive for making the most of the strong commitment to REDD+ reflected in the Paris Agreement. By including the perspective of functional differentiation, the article zooms in on the practical effects and opportunities of institutional fragmentation, thereby advancing current reasoning on this aspect of global environmental governance. Policy relevance Finance has been an issue for the success of REDD+ since its inception and is a recurrent theme in international negotiations. Funding sources, access modalities and disbursement remain points of contestation between recipient and donor countries and financial arrangements are often perceived as inadequate. By delineating extant types of REDD+ finance and access modalities, as well as discussing the practical implications of institutional fragmentation, this study is relevant for both practitioners as well as scholars interested in REDD+ finance. © 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/80265
Appears in Collections:科学计划与规划

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.


作者单位: Department of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Habelschwerdter Allee 45, Berlin, Germany; Department of Political Science, Freiburg University, Rempartstr. 15, Freiburg, Germany

Recommended Citation:
Well M,, Carrapatoso A. REDD+ finance: policy making in the context of fragmented institutions[J]. Climate Policy,2017-01-01,17(6)
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Well M]'s Articles
[, Carrapatoso A]'s Articles
百度学术
Similar articles in Baidu Scholar
[Well M]'s Articles
[, Carrapatoso A]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[Well M]‘s Articles
[, Carrapatoso A]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.