globalchange  > 科学计划与规划
DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2015.1094728
Scopus记录号: 2-s2.0-84945208302
论文题名:
An ‘equal effort’ approach to assessing the North–South climate finance gap
作者: Bowen A; , Campiglio E; , Herreras Martinez S
刊名: Climate Policy
ISSN: 1469-3062
EISSN: 1752-7457
出版年: 2017
卷: 17, 期:2
起始页码: 231
结束页码: 245
语种: 英语
英文关键词: carbon markets ; climate finance ; equitable development ; integrated assessment models ; North–South flows
Scopus关键词: carbon emission ; climate change ; developing world ; environmental economics ; environmental policy ; finance ; integrated approach ; modeling
Scopus学科分类: nvironmental Science: General Environmental Science ; Earth and Planetary Sciences: Atmospheric Science
英文摘要: This study employs a number of Integrated Assessment Models to determine what the optimal financial transfers between high-income and developing economies would be if climate mitigation effort, measured as mitigation costs as a share of gross domestic product, were to be divided equally across regions through a global carbon market. We find these to be larger than both current and planned international climate finance flows. Four out of six models imply that a North–South annual financial transfer of around US$400 billion is required by 2050, while the other two models imply larger sums, up to $2 trillion. However, the outlook for multi-country carbon markets is not encouraging at the moment. We thus review some potential sources of funds that might be used to fill the climate finance gap, including public aid, private investment, development banks, and special climate-related facilities. We find the shortcomings of public climate finance appear particularly hard to overcome, and argue that expanding private finance, either in the form of Foreign Direct Investment or through the issuance of ‘green bonds’, appears to be a more promising direction. Policy relevance Climate change is a profoundly asymmetric development issue, as countries at lower stages of development are likely to suffer disproportionate climate damages and mitigation costs. High-income countries have agreed to mobilise $100 billion a year by 2020 ‘to address the needs of developing countries’. However, scaling up climate finance has been slow and, more importantly, targets have not been chosen on the basis of a ‘scientific’ assessment. This article presents a novel, model-based analysis of the ‘equal effort’ inter-regional climate finance that could provide useful insights to policy makers in future negotiations. The gap identified by comparing models’ projections to current and planned financial flows is large but not prohibitive. In particular, private investment appears to be the most likely channel to fill the gap, although various public policies need to be implemented to improve the risk/return profile of low-carbon investment opportunities. © 2015 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/80307
Appears in Collections:科学计划与规划

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.


作者单位: London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom; Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 2, CS, Utrecht, Netherlands

Recommended Citation:
Bowen A,, Campiglio E,, Herreras Martinez S. An ‘equal effort’ approach to assessing the North–South climate finance gap[J]. Climate Policy,2017-01-01,17(2)
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Bowen A]'s Articles
[, Campiglio E]'s Articles
[, Herreras Martinez S]'s Articles
百度学术
Similar articles in Baidu Scholar
[Bowen A]'s Articles
[, Campiglio E]'s Articles
[, Herreras Martinez S]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[Bowen A]‘s Articles
[, Campiglio E]‘s Articles
[, Herreras Martinez S]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.