DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2014.968762
Scopus记录号: 2-s2.0-84952298633
论文题名: The (ir)relevance of transaction costs in climate policy instrument choice: an analysis of the EU and the US
作者: Joas F ; , Flachsland C
刊名: Climate Policy
ISSN: 1469-3062
EISSN: 1752-7457
出版年: 2016
卷: 16, 期: 1 起始页码: 26
结束页码: 49
语种: 英语
英文关键词: carbon tax
; climate policy instruments
; emissions trading schemes
; EU Emissions Trading Scheme
; OECD
; transaction costs
Scopus关键词: climate change
; emissions trading
; environmental policy
; European Union
; OECD
; pollution tax
; transaction cost
; Germany
; United States
Scopus学科分类: nvironmental Science: General Environmental Science
; Earth and Planetary Sciences: Atmospheric Science
英文摘要: This article assesses the relevance of ex post transaction costs in the choice of climate policy instruments in the EU (focusing mainly on the example of Germany) and the US. It reviews all publicly available empirical ex post transaction cost studies of climate policy instruments broken down by the main private and public sector cost factors and offers hypotheses on how these factors may scale depending on instrument design and other contextual factors. The key finding from the evaluated schemes is that it is possible to reject the hypothesis that asymmetries in ex post transaction costs across instruments are large and, thus, play a pivotal role in climate policy instrument choice. Both total and relative ex post transaction costs can be considered low. This conjecture differs from the experience in other areas of environmental policy instruments where high total transaction costs are considered to be important factors in the overall assessment of optimal environmental policy choice. Against this background, the main claim of this article is that in climate policy instrument choice, ex post transaction cost considerations play a minor role in large countries that feature similar institutional characteristics as the EU and the US. Rather, the focus should be on the efficiency properties of instruments for incentivizing abatement, as well as equity and political economy considerations (and other societally relevant objectives). In order to inform transaction cost considerations in climate policy instrument choice in countries that adopt new climate policies, more data would be desirable in order to enable more robust estimates of design- and context-specific transaction-cost scaling factors. Policy relevance The findings of this study can help inform policy makers who plan to set up novel climate policy instruments. The results indicate that ex post transaction costs play a minor role for large countries that feature similar institutional characteristics as the EU and the US. For instrument design the focus should rather be on efficiency properties of instruments in incentivizing abatement, as well as equity and political economy considerations (and other societally relevant objectives). © 2014 Taylor & Francis. Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/80394
Appears in Collections: 科学计划与规划
There are no files associated with this item.
作者单位: Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), Telegrafenberg 31, Potsdam, Germany; Mercator Research Institute on Global Commons and Climate Change (MCC), Torgauer Straße 12–15, Berlin, Germany
Recommended Citation:
Joas F,, Flachsland C. The (ir)relevance of transaction costs in climate policy instrument choice: an analysis of the EU and the US[J]. Climate Policy,2016-01-01,16(1)