globalchange  > 科学计划与规划
DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2014.859501
Scopus记录号: 2-s2.0-84897573686
论文题名:
Stakeholder engagement in adaptation interventions: An evaluation of projects in developing nations
作者: Sherman M; H; , Ford J
刊名: Climate Policy
ISSN: 1469-3062
EISSN: 1752-7457
出版年: 2014
卷: 14, 期:3
起始页码: 417
结束页码: 441
语种: 英语
英文关键词: adaptation ; bottom-up approaches ; climate change ; developing countries ; stakeholder participation/engagement ; top-down approaches
Scopus关键词: adaptive management ; bottom-up approach ; climate change ; developing world ; local participation ; poverty ; project design ; stakeholder ; sustainability ; top-down control
Scopus学科分类: nvironmental Science: General Environmental Science ; Earth and Planetary Sciences: Atmospheric Science
英文摘要: Institution-oriented, top-down and community-oriented, bottom-up stakeholder approaches are evaluated for their ability to enable or constrain the implementation of adaptation in developing nations. A systematic review approach is used evaluate the project performance of 18 adaptation projects by three of the Global Environment Facility's (GEF) adaptation programmes (the Strategic Priority for Adaptation (SPA), the Special Climate Change Fund (SCCF), and the National Adaptation Programs of Action (NAPA)) according to effectiveness, efficiency, equity, legitimacy, flexibility, sustainability, and replicability. The ten SPA projects reviewed performed highest overall, especially with regards to efficiency, legitimacy, and replicability. The five SCCF projects performed the highest in equity, flexibility, and sustainability, and the three NAPA-related projects were the highest-performing projects with regards to effectiveness. A comparison of top-down and bottom-up approaches revealed that community stakeholder engagement in project design and implementation led to higher effectiveness, efficiency, equity, flexibility, legitimacy, sustainability, and replicability. Although low institutional capacity constrained both project success and effective community participation, projects that hired international staff to assist in implementation experienced higher overall performance. These case studies also illustrate how participatory methods can fail to genuinely empower or involve communities in adaptation interventions in both top-down and bottom-up approaches. It is thus crucial to carefully consider stakeholder engagement strategies in adaptation interventions.Policy relevanceWhile adaptation is now firmly on the policy and research agenda, actual interventions to reduce vulnerability and enhance resilience remain in their infancy, and there is limited information on the factors that influence the successful implementation of adaptation in developing areas. Engaging stakeholders in assessing vulnerability and implementing adaptation interventions is widely regarded to be an important factor for adaptation implementation and success. However, no study has evaluated the effects of stakeholder engagement in the actual implementation of adaptation initiatives. Effective stakeholder engagement is challenging, especially in a developing nation setting, due to high levels of poverty, inadequate knowledge on adaptation options, weak institutions, and competing interests to address more immediate problems related to poverty and underdevelopment. In this context, this article documents and characterizes stakeholder engagement in adaptation interventions supported through the GEF, examining how top-down or bottom-up stakeholder approaches enable or constrain project performance. © 2013 Taylor & Francis.
Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/80462
Appears in Collections:科学计划与规划

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.


作者单位: Department of Geography, McGill University, Burnside Hall 805 Sherbrooke Street W., Montreal, QC H3A 0B9, Canada

Recommended Citation:
Sherman M,H,, Ford J. Stakeholder engagement in adaptation interventions: An evaluation of projects in developing nations[J]. Climate Policy,2014-01-01,14(3)
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Sherman M]'s Articles
[H]'s Articles
[, Ford J]'s Articles
百度学术
Similar articles in Baidu Scholar
[Sherman M]'s Articles
[H]'s Articles
[, Ford J]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[Sherman M]‘s Articles
[H]‘s Articles
[, Ford J]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.