globalchange  > 气候减缓与适应
DOI: 10.1007/s10584-017-1959-3
Scopus记录号: 2-s2.0-85017441553
论文题名:
Effects of fairness principles on willingness to pay for climate change mitigation
作者: Anderson B.; Bernauer T.; Balietti S.
刊名: Climatic Change
ISSN: 0165-0009
EISSN: 1573-1480
出版年: 2017
卷: 142, 期:2018-03-04
起始页码: 447
结束页码: 461
语种: 英语
Scopus关键词: Global warming ; Climate change mitigation ; Cost allocation ; Global climates ; Multilateral negotiations ; On-line experiments ; Public support ; Ultimatum game ; Willingness to pay ; Climate change ; adaptive management ; climate change ; environmental policy ; experimental study ; global climate ; global warming ; international agreement ; Internet ; willingness to pay
英文摘要: Despite the shift from multilateral negotiations on legally binding mitigation commitments to the decentralized nonbinding Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDCs) approach in global climate policy, governments and other stakeholders continue to insist that fairness principles guide the overall effort. Key recurring principles in this debate are capacity and historical responsibility. To keep global warming within the internationally agreed 2 °C limit, many countries will have to engage in more ambitious climate policies relative to current INDCs. Public support will be crucial in this respect. We thus explore the implications of different fairness principles for citizens’ preferences concerning burden sharing in climate policy. To this end, we implemented an online experiment in which participants (N = 414) played an ultimatum game. Participants were tasked with sharing the costs of climate change mitigation. The aim was to examine how participants’ willingness to pay for mitigation was influenced by capacity and historical responsibility considerations. The results show that fairness principles do have a strong effect and that participants applied fairness principles differently depending on their position at the outset. It turns out that participants paid more attention to other players’ capacity and historical responsibility when proposing a particular cost allocation and more attention to their own capacity and responsibility when responding to proposals by others. These and other findings suggest that framing climate policy in terms of internationally coordinated unilateral measures is likely to garner more public support than framing climate policy in terms of a global bargaining effort over the mitigation burden. © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017.
Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/84028
Appears in Collections:气候减缓与适应
气候变化事实与影响

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.


作者单位: Center for Comparative and International Studies (CIS), ETH Zürich, Haldeneggsteig 4, Zürich, Switzerland; Network Science Institute, Northeastern University, 177 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, United States; Harvard Institute for Quantitative Social Science, Cambridge, MA, United States; D’Amore-McKim School of Business, Boston, MA, United States

Recommended Citation:
Anderson B.,Bernauer T.,Balietti S.. Effects of fairness principles on willingness to pay for climate change mitigation[J]. Climatic Change,2017-01-01,142(2018-03-04)
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Anderson B.]'s Articles
[Bernauer T.]'s Articles
[Balietti S.]'s Articles
百度学术
Similar articles in Baidu Scholar
[Anderson B.]'s Articles
[Bernauer T.]'s Articles
[Balietti S.]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[Anderson B.]‘s Articles
[Bernauer T.]‘s Articles
[Balietti S.]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.