globalchange  > 气候减缓与适应
DOI: 10.1007/s10584-013-0940-z
Scopus记录号: 2-s2.0-84898434603
论文题名:
The value of bioenergy in low stabilization scenarios: An assessment using REMIND-MAgPIE
作者: Klein D.; Luderer G.; Kriegler E.; Strefler J.; Bauer N.; Leimbach M.; Popp A.; Dietrich J.P.; Humpenöder F.; Lotze-Campen H.; Edenhofer O.
刊名: Climatic Change
ISSN: 0165-0009
EISSN: 1573-1480
出版年: 2014
卷: 123, 期:2018-03-04
起始页码: 705
结束页码: 718
语种: 英语
Scopus关键词: Biofuels ; Carbon ; Carbon capture ; Costs ; Economics ; Fossil fuels ; Hydrogen production ; Investments ; Stabilization ; Bioenergy conversion ; Bioenergy potential ; Bioenergy technology ; Carbon capture and storage ; Climate stabilization ; Energy productions ; Integrated assessment ; Mitigation options ; Biomass
英文摘要: This study investigates the use of bioenergy for achieving stringent climate stabilization targets and it analyzes the economic drivers behind the choice of bioenergy technologies. We apply the integrated assessment framework REMIND-MAgPIE to show that bioenergy, particularly if combined with carbon capture and storage (CCS) is a crucial mitigation option with high deployment levels and high technology value. If CCS is available, bioenergy is exclusively used with CCS. We find that the ability of bioenergy to provide negative emissions gives rise to a strong nexus between biomass prices and carbon prices. Ambitious climate policy could result in bioenergy prices of 70 $/GJ (or even 430 $/GJ if bioenergy potential is limited to 100 EJ/year), which indicates a strong demand for bioenergy. For low stabilization scenarios with BECCS availability, we find that the carbon value of biomass tends to exceed its pure energy value. Therefore, the driving factor behind investments into bioenergy conversion capacities for electricity and hydrogen production are the revenues generated from negative emissions, rather than from energy production. However, in REMIND modern bioenergy is predominantly used to produce low-carbon fuels, since the transport sector has significantly fewer low-carbon alternatives to biofuels than the power sector. Since negative emissions increase the amount of permissible emissions from fossil fuels, given a climate target, bioenergy acts as a complement to fossils rather than a substitute. This makes the short-term and long-term deployment of fossil fuels dependent on the long-term availability of BECCS. © 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/84863
Appears in Collections:气候减缓与适应
气候变化事实与影响

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.


作者单位: Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), Potsdam, Brandenburg, Germany

Recommended Citation:
Klein D.,Luderer G.,Kriegler E.,et al. The value of bioenergy in low stabilization scenarios: An assessment using REMIND-MAgPIE[J]. Climatic Change,2014-01-01,123(2018-03-04)
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Klein D.]'s Articles
[Luderer G.]'s Articles
[Kriegler E.]'s Articles
百度学术
Similar articles in Baidu Scholar
[Klein D.]'s Articles
[Luderer G.]'s Articles
[Kriegler E.]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[Klein D.]‘s Articles
[Luderer G.]‘s Articles
[Kriegler E.]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.