DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.06.030
Scopus记录号: 2-s2.0-84947612921
论文题名: Is there a possibility of ranking benthic quality assessment indices to select the most responsive to different human pressures?
作者: Borja Á. ; Marín S.L. ; Muxika I. ; Pino L. ; Rodríguez J.G.
刊名: Marine Pollution Bulletin
ISSN: 0025-326X
EISSN: 1879-3363
出版年: 2015
卷: 97, 期: 2018-01-02 起始页码: 85
结束页码: 94
语种: 英语
英文关键词: Biotic indices
; Human pressures
; Marine management
; Selecting assessment indices
Scopus关键词: Ecosystems
; Environmental management
; Eutrophication
; Sewage
; Assessment index
; Biotic Index
; Chemical pollution
; Environmental managers
; Human pressures
; Marine biotic indices
; Marine management
; Quality assessment index
; Climate change
; anthropogenic effect
; assessment method
; benthos
; biotic factor
; human activity
; index method
; marine pollution
; ranking
; aquaculture
; Article
; AZTI Marine Biotic Index
; Benthic Opportunistic Polychaetes Amphipod
; Benthic Quality Index
; benthos
; Bentix
; biogeographic region
; climate change
; environmental impact
; environmental management
; environmental parameters
; eutrophication
; human activities
; multivariate AMBI
; pollution
; pressure
; quality control
; scoring system
; sewage disposal
; animal
; aquatic species
; ecosystem
; environmental monitoring
; invertebrate
; procedures
; sewage
; standards
; Amphipoda
; Polychaeta
; sewage
; Animals
; Aquaculture
; Aquatic Organisms
; Climate Change
; Ecosystem
; Environmental Monitoring
; Eutrophication
; Invertebrates
; Sewage
Scopus学科分类: Agricultural and Biological Sciences: Aquatic Science
; Earth and Planetary Sciences: Oceanography
; Environmental Science: Pollution
英文摘要: Although a plethora of benthic indices exist, there is no agreement on what index or indices should be used by environmental managers to establish benthic quality. The objective of this investigation was to rank 35 benthic quality assessment indices used in different countries to evaluate the impact produced by 15 different human pressures (including multipressure, aquaculture, sewage discharges, eutrophication, physical alteration, chemical pollution, climate change, etc.). The ranking was determined by taking into account the coverage area of biogeographical provinces, number of citations testing a pressure and number of citations with significant correlation with pressure. We analysed 363 references, of which 169 showed quantitative data. Over a potential total score of 100, the highest values were obtained by the following indices: (i) AZTI's Marine Biotic Index (AMBI), which scored 77, tested by using 14 pressures in 14 provinces from the Arctic to tropical seas; (ii) multivariate AMBI (M-AMBI), which scored 74, tested with 12 pressures in 13 provinces; (iii) Bentix (BENTIX), which scored 68, tested with nine pressures in six provinces; (iv) Benthic Quality Index (BQI), which scored 66, tested with five pressures in seven provinces; and (v) Benthic Opportunistic Polychaetes Amphipods (BOPA) index, which scored 62, tested with eight pressures in six provinces. © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/85940
Appears in Collections: 过去全球变化的重建 全球变化的国际研究计划
There are no files associated with this item.
作者单位: AZTI, Marine Research Division, Herrera Kaia Portualdea s/n, Pasaia, Spain; Institute of Aquaculture, Austral University of Chile, P.O. Box 1327, Puerto Montt, Chile
Recommended Citation:
Borja Á.,Marín S.L.,Muxika I.,et al. Is there a possibility of ranking benthic quality assessment indices to select the most responsive to different human pressures?[J]. Marine Pollution Bulletin,2015-01-01,97(2018-01-02)