Development Studies
; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
英文摘要:
The sources and governance of climate finance have been widely debated since the 2009 climate change summit in Copenhagen, when rich countries promised to provide US$ 30 billion in additional climate finance by 2012 and to mobilize US$ 100 billion a year by 2020 to address the mitigation and adaptation needs of developing countries. Have developed countries respected their financial commitments? Which countries have been the main beneficiaries of international climate money? As simple as these questions may seem, answers to them have proved to be highly controversial and have contributed to a continuous erosion of trust between Parties in international climate negotiations. This article explores the controversies around international climate finance figures. It examines how the lack of internationally agreed modalities to account for climate finance has given rise to a plethora of accounting and reporting practices that leads to widely contrasting statements on climate finance. We show that, despite some gaps, the Paris Agreement's "enhanced transparency framework" could lead to marked improvements in the way climate finance is accounted and reported.
1.Free Univ Brussels, Univ Libre Bruxelles, Inst Environm Management & Land Use Planning, Ctr Studies Sustainable Dev, Ave FD Roosevelt 50 CP130-03, B-1050 Ixelles, Belgium 2.Brown Univ, Inst Environm & Soc, Climate & Dev Lab, Box 1951, Providence, RI 02912 USA
Recommended Citation:
Weikmans, Romain,Roberts, J. Timmons. The international climate finance accounting muddle: is there hope on the horizon?[J]. CLIMATE AND DEVELOPMENT,2019-01-01,11(2):97-111