globalchange  > 气候变化事实与影响
DOI: 10.1111/ropr.12324
WOS记录号: WOS:000460938100006
论文题名:
When Is Science Used in Science Policy? Examining the Importance of Scientific and Technical Information in National Research Council Reports
作者: Bozeman, Barry1; Youtie, Jan2; Fukumoto, Eriko3; Parker, Marla4
通讯作者: Bozeman, Barry
刊名: REVIEW OF POLICY RESEARCH
ISSN: 1541-132X
EISSN: 1541-1338
出版年: 2019
卷: 36, 期:2, 页码:262-289
语种: 英语
英文关键词: national governance ; civil society ; innovation ; intellectual property
WOS关键词: CLIMATE-CHANGE ; INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ; MENTAL MODELS ; KNOWLEDGE ; CREDIBILITY ; ADVICE ; TRUTH
WOS学科分类: Political Science ; Public Administration
WOS研究方向: Government & Law ; Public Administration
英文摘要:

A frequent lament among researchers is that public policy makers should pay more attention to scientific and technical information (STI). If there is any single area where one might expect STI to be used in public policy making and agenda setting it is in science and technology policy. Many of the policy makers in science and technology policy are themselves scientists or researchers and presumably would prove especially receptive to STI. However, STI is only one of many types of information used in policy making and policy actors often differ in the extent to which they view STI as credible, particularly compared to other types of potentially policy-relevant information. Research on credibility (the believability of information, information types, and media) has shown variance and policy makers' "credibility maps." Thus, some policy makers have preference for formal information generally and STI specifically, but others privilege raw data, personal experience, authority, history and anecdote, analogical reasoning, or conformance to ideology, to name just a few of the information choices. Here, we build on the current researchers' previous bibliometrics-based work and use data from 41 semi-structured elite interviews with National Research Council (NRC) executives and staff and NRC committee members concerning the use of STI in reports issued by the NRC. Findings show that the use of STI in NRC reports varies according to the nature of the inquiry and the sponsor. Information used in the reports is based on not only the assessed credibility of information but also its perceived direct relevance and the availability of STI as compared to other types of information. In general, the amount of STI in the NRC reports tends to have modest effects on the likelihood that reports will be used in policy making or by the mass media. More important factors include the timing of the report with respect to political agendas, the party requesting the report, and the enacted roles of NRC staff members and committee chairs.


Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/131127
Appears in Collections:气候变化事实与影响

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.


作者单位: 1.Arizona State Univ, Sci & Technol Policy & Publ Management, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
2.Georgia Tech, Atlanta, GA USA
3.Hiroshima Univ, Res Planning Off, Hiroshima, Japan
4.Calif State Univ Los Angeles, Polit Sci, Los Angeles, CA 90032 USA

Recommended Citation:
Bozeman, Barry,Youtie, Jan,Fukumoto, Eriko,et al. When Is Science Used in Science Policy? Examining the Importance of Scientific and Technical Information in National Research Council Reports[J]. REVIEW OF POLICY RESEARCH,2019-01-01,36(2):262-289
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Bozeman, Barry]'s Articles
[Youtie, Jan]'s Articles
[Fukumoto, Eriko]'s Articles
百度学术
Similar articles in Baidu Scholar
[Bozeman, Barry]'s Articles
[Youtie, Jan]'s Articles
[Fukumoto, Eriko]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[Bozeman, Barry]‘s Articles
[Youtie, Jan]‘s Articles
[Fukumoto, Eriko]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.