globalchange  > 过去全球变化的重建
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216452
WOS记录号: WOS:000467556300024
论文题名:
Sustainability assessment of agricultural rainwater harvesting: Evaluation of alternative crop types and irrigation practices
作者: Ghimire, Santosh R.1,2; Johnston, John M.2
通讯作者: Ghimire, Santosh R. ; Johnston, John M.
刊名: PLOS ONE
ISSN: 1932-6203
出版年: 2019
卷: 14, 期:5
语种: 英语
WOS关键词: LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT ; CLIMATE-CHANGE ; WATER-RESOURCES ; SCIENCE ; EFFICIENCY ; FRAMEWORK ; IMPACTS ; SYSTEMS ; MODEL ; LCA
WOS学科分类: Multidisciplinary Sciences
WOS研究方向: Science & Technology - Other Topics
英文摘要:

Rainwater harvesting (RWH) has been used globally to address water scarcity for various ecosystem uses, including crop irrigation requirements, and to meet the water resource needs of a growing world population. However, the costs, benefits and impacts of alternative crop types and irrigation practices is challenging to evaluate comprehensively. We present an assessment methodology to evaluate the sustainability of agricultural systems as applied to a southeastern U.S. river basin. We utilized detailed, crop-level cultivation information to calculate sustainability indicators (relative to well-water irrigation) at the basin scale (6-digit Hydrologic Unit Codes). 40 design configurations comprising crop types and irrigation practices were evaluated to demonstrate the methodology's robustness. Four RWH designs and four major crops (pasture-grass, soybeans, corn, and cotton) resembling current practices were evaluated, as well as six combined systems (combined RWH and well-water systems) with four globally representative crops (corn, soybeans, wheat, and quinoa). Sustainability scores were calculated by integrating seven life cycle impact indicators (cumulative energy demand, CO2 emission, blue water use, ecotoxicity, eutrophication, human health-cancer, and life cycle costs). At a basin-wide RWH adoption rate of 25%, the benefits, relative to 100% well-water, of the RWH systems irrigating soybeans and supported with well-water (0.4 well-water: 0.6 RWH) provided cumulative energy savings of 39 Peta Joule and reductions in CO2 emission, blue water use, ecotoxicity, eutrophication, and human health-cancer at 1.9 Mt CO2 eq., 6.9 Gm(3), 5.7 MCTU, 6.6 kt N eq., and 0.07 CTU, respectively. These benefits increased linearly with RWH scaling variables including the adoption rates, system service life, crop area, and water needs. Our methodology integrates the three pillars of agricultural sustainability specific to rainwater harvesting into a single score. It is applicable to other locations worldwide facing water scarcity by modifying the RWH system design, selecting other crop types, and obtaining appropriate data.


Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/138276
Appears in Collections:过去全球变化的重建

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.


作者单位: 1.Global Sustainabil & Life Cycle Consultant LLC, Athens, GA 30605 USA
2.US Environm Protect Agcy, Off Res & Dev, Computat Exposure Div, Athens, GA 30605 USA

Recommended Citation:
Ghimire, Santosh R.,Johnston, John M.. Sustainability assessment of agricultural rainwater harvesting: Evaluation of alternative crop types and irrigation practices[J]. PLOS ONE,2019-01-01,14(5)
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Ghimire, Santosh R.]'s Articles
[Johnston, John M.]'s Articles
百度学术
Similar articles in Baidu Scholar
[Ghimire, Santosh R.]'s Articles
[Johnston, John M.]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[Ghimire, Santosh R.]‘s Articles
[Johnston, John M.]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.