globalchange  > 全球变化的国际研究计划
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.026
WOS记录号: WOS:000472695200067
论文题名:
Comparative life cycle assessment of lithium-ion batteries for electric vehicles addressing capacity fade
作者: Marques, Pedro1; Garcia, Rita1; Kulay, Luiz2; Freire, Fausto1
通讯作者: Freire, Fausto
刊名: JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
ISSN: 0959-6526
EISSN: 1879-1786
出版年: 2019
卷: 229, 页码:787-794
语种: 英语
英文关键词: Electric vehicle (EV) ; Capacity fade ; Environmental impacts ; Lithium-ion batteries ; LCA
WOS关键词: STATE-OF-CHARGE ; 2ND LIFE ; DEGRADATION ; MODEL ; PARAMETERS ; IMPACT
WOS学科分类: Green & Sustainable Science & Technology ; Engineering, Environmental ; Environmental Sciences
WOS研究方向: Science & Technology - Other Topics ; Engineering ; Environmental Sciences & Ecology
英文摘要:

Lithium-ion batteries are currently used in electric vehicles (EVs) with many advantages; however, batteries contribute significantly to the life cycle environmental impacts of these vehicles. This article presents a comparative life cycle assessment of two types of batteries - lithium manganese oxide (LiMn2O4) and lithium ion phosphate (LiFePO4) - frequently used in EVs, addressing real -life operational conditions and battery capacity fade. The influence of the location of battery manufacturing and vehicle charging (electricity mix) was also assessed. A life cycle model of batteries in an EV with a service life of 200 000 km (functional unit) was implemented to assess Primary Fossil Energy, Global Warming, Acidification, and Eutrophication impacts. Moreover, the environmental performance of EVs considering both battery types was evaluated. The LiFePO4 battery had better operational performance than the LiMn2O4 one and fewer batteries were needed over the EV service life. Conversely, the life cycle impacts of the LiFePO4 batteries were higher than the LiMn2O4 ones mainly due to higher manufacturing impacts. In countries with a mix based on renewable electricity, the battery production is the most important contributor to impacts, while in countries with electricity mostly from fossil sources, the use phase is the most important. For both battery types and most impact categories, the environmental impacts of EVs were highly dependent on the usage scenario and the electricity mix used for charging. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.


Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/145632
Appears in Collections:全球变化的国际研究计划

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.


作者单位: 1.Univ Coimbra, Dept Mech Engn, ADAI, LAETA, Polo 2 Campus,R Luis Reis Santos, P-3030788 Coimbra, Portugal
2.Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Chem Engn, Polytech Sch, Ave Prof Lineu Prestes 580,Bloco 18 Conjunto Quim, BR-05424970 Sao Paulo, Brazil

Recommended Citation:
Marques, Pedro,Garcia, Rita,Kulay, Luiz,et al. Comparative life cycle assessment of lithium-ion batteries for electric vehicles addressing capacity fade[J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION,2019-01-01,229:787-794
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Marques, Pedro]'s Articles
[Garcia, Rita]'s Articles
[Kulay, Luiz]'s Articles
百度学术
Similar articles in Baidu Scholar
[Marques, Pedro]'s Articles
[Garcia, Rita]'s Articles
[Kulay, Luiz]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[Marques, Pedro]‘s Articles
[Garcia, Rita]‘s Articles
[Kulay, Luiz]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.