globalchange  > 全球变化的国际研究计划
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.05.027
WOS记录号: WOS:000480376500006
论文题名:
Misunderstanding conservation agriculture: Challenges in promoting, monitoring and evaluating sustainable farming
作者: Findlater, K. M.1,2,3; Kandlikar, M.1,2; Satterfield, T.1
通讯作者: Findlater, K. M.
刊名: ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY
ISSN: 1462-9011
EISSN: 1873-6416
出版年: 2019
卷: 100, 页码:47-54
语种: 英语
英文关键词: Conservation agriculture ; Sustainable agriculture ; Climate change adaptation ; Climate resilience ; South Africa
WOS关键词: CLIMATE-CHANGE ; ADOPTION ; ADAPTATION ; BEHAVIOR
WOS学科分类: Environmental Sciences
WOS研究方向: Environmental Sciences & Ecology
英文摘要:

Commercial agriculture is central to problems of sustainability in food, water, energy and climate change. Appropriate solutions will depend on the effective promotion, monitoring and evaluation of changes in farming practice. Conservation agriculture (CA) is an important example of sustainable intensification and climate-smart agriculture, increasing the productivity and reliability of grain production while reducing agricultural inputs and future climate risks when adopted comprehensively. But to understand its implementation and benefits, researchers often rely on simplified measures of CA adoption (e.g., single proxies, binary measures, broad self assessments, expert estimates). Here we use a national survey of South Africa's commercial grain farmers (n = 441), contextualized by previous interviews, to investigate common measures of adoption and their implications for CA's promotion, monitoring and evaluation. These farmers are unusually informative, because they are unsubsidized but have the capacity, incentive and willingness to adapt to climate change. We find that they are adopting CA autonomously, but that their implementation is highly variable and their interpretation of farming practice differs from that of local experts. Single proxies, binary adoption variables and broad farmer self-assessments suggest that between 40 and 80% of farmers have adopted CA. However, when evaluated across the three CA principles using UN-defined adoption thresholds, the comprehensive adoption rate is only 14%. Farmers' definition of "conservation" differs substantially from that of the local experts most likely to be asked to contribute adoption estimates to global monitoring efforts, creating the potential for miscommunication. There is therefore substantial cause for concern in how CA is currently promoted, monitored and evaluated. Inaccurate adoption estimates jeopardize CA's potential as a climate change adaptation strategy, creating illusory progress that may disincentivize further substantive efforts towards agricultural sustainability and climate resilience.


Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/147101
Appears in Collections:全球变化的国际研究计划

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.


作者单位: 1.Univ British Columbia, Inst Resources Environm & Sustainabil, Vancouver, BC, Canada
2.Univ British Columbia, Sch Publ Policy & Global Affairs, Vancouver, BC, Canada
3.Univ Cape Town, African Climate & Dev Initiat, Cape Town, South Africa

Recommended Citation:
Findlater, K. M.,Kandlikar, M.,Satterfield, T.. Misunderstanding conservation agriculture: Challenges in promoting, monitoring and evaluating sustainable farming[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY,2019-01-01,100:47-54
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Findlater, K. M.]'s Articles
[Kandlikar, M.]'s Articles
[Satterfield, T.]'s Articles
百度学术
Similar articles in Baidu Scholar
[Findlater, K. M.]'s Articles
[Kandlikar, M.]'s Articles
[Satterfield, T.]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[Findlater, K. M.]‘s Articles
[Kandlikar, M.]‘s Articles
[Satterfield, T.]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.