globalchange  > 气候变化事实与影响
CSCD记录号: CSCD:5657847
论文题名:
2004年-2013年WindSat海表面温度产品与浮标观测对比
其他题名: Accuracy of WindSat sea surface temperature: Comparison of buoy data from 2004 to 2013
作者: 朱恩泽; 张雷; 石汉青; 廖麒翔; 龙智勇
刊名: 遥感学报
ISSN: 1007-4619
出版年: 2016
卷: 20, 期:2, 页码:315-327
语种: 中文
中文关键词: 海表面温度 ; NDBC浮标 ; TAO浮标
英文关键词: WindSat ; AMSR-E ; Key-words: sea surface temperature ; WindSat ; NDBC buoy ; TAO buoy ; AMSR-E
WOS学科分类: OCEANOGRAPHY
WOS研究方向: Oceanography
中文摘要: 利用美国国家浮标数据中心NDBC和热带大气海洋计划TAO浮标的海表面温度数据,对WindSat 2004年2013年近10年的海表面温度产品进行了验证。结果表明,在美国沿岸海域,WindSat反演得到的海表面温度的平均偏差为0.10 ℃,标准偏差为0.59 ℃;在近赤道太平洋海域,反演得到的海表面温度的平均偏差为-0.15 ℃,标准偏差为0.33 ℃。WindSat海表面温度在夏季相对浮标实测值有正偏差增大和负偏差缩小的趋势,在美国东海岸以及墨西哥湾区域部分站点反演得到的海表面温度的标准偏差较大,其标准偏差超过1 ℃。在5-10m/s风速段,WindSat海表面温度反演效果比较理想,平均偏差和标准偏差相对恒定。当风速大于12 m/s时,WindSat海表面温度反演的不确定性明显增加。与AMSR-E月平均海表面温度产品对比发现,夏季,WindSat SST较AMSR-E偏低;冬季,WindSat SST较AMSR-E偏高。
英文摘要: Sea Surface Temperature (SST) is one of the important parameters of hydrodynamic and oceanographic research. It has been widely utilized in the study of climate change, weather forecasting, numerical weather prediction(NWP), atmospheric and oceanographic applications, fisheries, and other sciences. This study comparesSST derived from WindSat to those directly observed by NDBC/TAO buoy and SST provided by AMSR-E. In the collocation of WindSat and buoy data, an SST value with a rain rate larger than zero was rejected. Collocation adopted a 30 min time constraint and 25 km maximum separation. A total of 82,247 WindSat-NDBC collocations and 366,693 Wind-Sat-TAO collocations were acquired. Rsults show that WindSat SST has a mean bias of 0.10 ℃ and standard deviation of 0.59 ℃ in the coastal and offshore waters of the United States. In the tropical Pacific Ocean, WindSat SST has a mean bias of-0.15 ℃ and standard deviation of 0.33 ℃. In addition, WindSat SST has an increasing warm bias or a decreasing cool bias in summer. The standard deviations of the satellite-derived SST are both relatively large in the US East Coast and in the Gulf of Mexico; the standard deviations of certain regions are higher than 1 ℃. When the buoy wind speed ranges from 5 m/s to 10 m/s, the accuracy of WindSat SST is good, and the mean bias and standard deviation are relatively constant. When the buoy wind speed exceeds 12m/s, the uncertainty of WindSat SST increases. Global comparison with AMSR-E shows that WindSat monthly averaged SST is cooler than that of AMSR-Ein summer and warmer in winter. Even though it has operated beyond its designed life of seven years, WindSat SST continues to exhibit acceptable accuracy. WindSat retrieves SST better in tropical Pacific and worse in US coasts and in the Gulf of Mexico. The part of wind direction correction in retrieval algorithms needs to be improved to increase the accuracy of SST retrieval under conditions of high wind speed.
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/157122
Appears in Collections:气候变化事实与影响

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.


作者单位: 解放军理工大学气象海洋学院, 南京, 江苏 211101, 中国

Recommended Citation:
朱恩泽,张雷,石汉青,等. 2004年-2013年WindSat海表面温度产品与浮标观测对比[J]. 遥感学报,2016-01-01,20(2):315-327
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[朱恩泽]'s Articles
[张雷]'s Articles
[石汉青]'s Articles
百度学术
Similar articles in Baidu Scholar
[朱恩泽]'s Articles
[张雷]'s Articles
[石汉青]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[朱恩泽]‘s Articles
[张雷]‘s Articles
[石汉青]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.