Argentina
; Article
; Australia
; biodiversity
; Brazil
; Canada
; climate change
; ethnicity
; France
; health care organization
; health care policy
; human
; India
; information processing
; Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
; Mexico
; perception
; priority journal
; productivity
; publication
; scientist
; sex difference
; sexuality
; social discrimination
; sociology
; South Africa
; trend study
; United Kingdom
; United States
; workplace
; female
; government
; interpersonal communication
; public relations
; research
; statistics and numerical data
; women's rights
; Climate Change
; Communication
; Data Collection
; Female
; Government
; Humans
; Interinstitutional Relations
; Research
; Women
; Women's Rights
英文摘要:
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is an authoritative and influential source of reports on climate change. The lead authors of IPCC reports include scientists from around the world, but questions have been raised about the dominance of specific disciplines in the report and the disproportionate number of scholars from the Global North. In this paper, we analyze the as-yet-unexamined issue of gender and IPCC authorship, looking at changes in gender balance over time and analyzing women’s views about their experience and barriers to full participation, not only as women but also at the intersection of nationality, race, command of English, and discipline. Over time, we show that the proportion of female IPCC authors has seen a modest increase from less than 5% in 1990 to more than 20% in the most recent assessment reports. Based on responses from over 100 women IPCC authors, we find that many women report a positive experience in the way in which they are treated and in their ability to influence the report, although others report that some women were poorly represented and heard. We suggest that an intersectional lens is important: not all women experience the same obstacles: they face multiple and diverse barriers associated with social identifiers such as race, nationality, command of English, and disciplinary affiliation. The scientific community benefits from including all scientists, including women and those from the Global South. This paper documents barriers to participation and identifies opportunities to diversify climate science.
Gay-Antaki, M., School of Geography and Development, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85709, United States; Liverman, D., School of Geography and Development, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85709, United States
Recommended Citation:
Gay-Antaki M.,Liverman D.. Climate for women in climate science: Women scientists and the intergovernmental panel on climate change[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2018-01-01,115(9)