英文摘要: | Human conversion of forest ecosystems to agriculture is a major driver of global change. Conventionally, the impacts of the historical cropland expansion on Earth’s radiation balance have been quantified through two opposing effects: the release of stored carbon to the atmosphere as CO2 (warming) versus the increase in surface albedo (cooling)1. Changing forest cover has a third effect on the global radiation balance by altering emissions of biogenic volatile organic compounds (BVOCs) that control the loadings of multiple warming and cooling climate pollutants: tropospheric ozone (O3), methane (CH4) and aerosols. Although human land cover change has dominated BVOC emission variability over the past century2, 3, 4, the net effect on global climate has not been quantified. Here, I show that the effects of the global cropland expansion between the 1850s and 2000s on BVOC emissions and atmospheric chemistry have imposed an additional net global radiative impact of −0.11 ± 0.17 W m−2 (cooling). This magnitude is comparable to that of the surface albedo and land carbon release effects. I conclude that atmospheric chemistry must be considered in climate impact assessments of anthropogenic land cover change and in forestry for climate protection strategies.
Human land cover change has altered an estimated 50% of Earth’s land surface, mostly through conversion of forest ecosystems to agricultural uses5. The IPCC Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) provides global radiative forcing values for the opposing effects of land use on CO2 and surface albedo that have similar magnitudes but opposite sign: +0.17–0.51 W m−2 (1850–2000) versus −0.15 ± 0.10 W m−2 (1750–2011)1. The sign of the global average surface temperature response to these forcings due to human land cover change remains controversial6, 7. Thus, it is not known whether large-scale human deforestation has contributed to global warming or global cooling8, 9. Forest ecosystems return to the atmosphere about 1% of the annual carbon uptake by the land biosphere in the form of chemically reactive BVOCs (ref. 10). The ecological and physiological roles of BVOCs are broad, ranging from abiotic and biotic stress functions to integrated components of carbon metabolism. In the present-day climate state, the dominant BVOCs emitted are isoprene (400–600 TgC yr−1) and monoterpenes (30–130 TgC yr−1; ref. 10). Tropical and temperate vegetation tends to emit isoprene whereas boreal vegetation tends to emit monoterpenes. New-generation global BVOC emission models suggest that the BVOC emissions were about 20–25% higher in the pre-industrial climate state and that the cropland expansion is the major driver of the decrease in emissions over the past century2, 3, 4. This high sensitivity to human deforestation arises because of the strong BVOC emission dependence on ecosystem type: broadleaf forests are strong emitters whereas crops and grasses are weak emitters or even non-emitting10. BVOC emissions undergo rapid oxidation in the atmosphere, generating the climate pollutants O3 and biogenic secondary organic aerosol (SOA; ref. 11). The photochemical processing of BVOC emissions influences the oxidation capacity of the atmosphere, which affects the lifetime of CH4 and the production of other secondary aerosols, sulphate and nitrate, whose formation rates depend on the availability of oxidants12. O3 and CH4 are powerful greenhouse gases that warm the atmosphere. Aerosol particles (organics, sulphate and nitrate) predominantly scatter solar radiation back to space and lead to global cooling. The extent to which the past changes in BVOC emissions have altered global radiative forcing is not clear-cut at the outset because the perturbation involves multiple warming and cooling climate pollutants. Here, a global carbon–chemistry–climate model is employed to investigate the effects of the historical cropland expansion between the 1850s and 2000s on the BVOC emissions and climate pollutants. A baseline simulation representative of the chemical and meteorological background atmosphere in the 2000s is performed. Land cover and anthropogenic emissions are prescribed using harmonized gridded datasets that were developed for the IPCC AR5 assessment5, 13. Between the 1850s and 2000s the global crop cover fraction of vegetated land area more than doubles (14–37%) at the expense of grass (11–6%), shrub (6–3%), savanna (8–5%), deciduous (13–10%) and tropical rainforest (12–10%) (Supplementary Fig. 1). A sensitivity experiment is performed in which the 2000s baseline simulation is forced with the 1850s land cover dataset. The difference between these simulations allows faithful isolation of the effects of the 1850s–2000s land cover change on BVOC emissions and the climate pollutants and is defined as the case LAND. The 1850s land forcing also affects the climate pollutants via non-BVOC pathways, including hydrological cycle impacts on oxidant and aerosol sources and sinks, underlying surface albedo effects on aerosol–radiation interactions, and surface deposition rates. Therefore, a second pair of simulations is performed identical to above (2000s baseline and the 2000s baseline forced with the 1850s land cover dataset) but with the BVOC emissions held fixed at climatological monthly varying values for the 2000s. The difference between this simulation pair is defined as the case LAND-fixbvoc. In this case, the climate pollutants respond only to the non-BVOC mechanisms of land cover change. I follow the IPCC’s reporting structure and adopt the historical global mean annual average radiative forcing metric, which is a powerful indicator of the equilibrium global average surface temperature response to the perturbation. The global model is used to compute the radiative forcings due to O3, biogenic SOA, sulphate and nitrate for the LAND and LAND-fixbvoc cases. CH4 radiative forcing is calculated off-line using the simulated changes in CH4 chemical lifetime, which accounts for the indirect CH4 effects on stratospheric water vapour and the longer-term O3 response14. For two reasons this study does not consider aerosol–cloud interactions. First, the sign of the global radiation interaction between SOA and cloud in the present-day atmosphere is not robust across models, with published estimates ranging from +0.23 W m−2 to −0.77 W m−2 (refs 15, 16). Second, there is evidence that isoprene, the dominant BVOC in the temperate and tropical biomes where the cropland expansion has occurred, acts to inhibit new particle nucleation17. In the 2000s baseline, the simulated global source strength of BVOC emissions is 607 TgC yr−1 (isoprene = 404 TgC yr−1; monoterpene = 132 TgC yr−1; other VOCs = 70 TgC yr−1), which increases to 819 TgC yr−1 (isoprene = 539 TgC yr−1; monoterpene = 184 TgC yr−1; other VOCs = 96 TgC yr−1) when forced with the 1850s land cover dataset. Thus, the 1850s–2000s land cover change perturbation reduces the global BVOC emission source strength substantially by ~35%. This value is larger than the 20–25% calculated for pre-industrial to present day in previous studies because it represents the response to the land cover forcing only and does not take into account other global change factors, such as temperature and vegetation productivity, that tend to increase BVOC emissions since the pre-industrial and partially offset the reductions from deforestation. The CH4 chemical lifetime in the 2000s simulation is 10.7 yr, which increases by six months to 11.2 yr in the 2000s simulation forced with 1850s land cover. The LAND case results in global radiative cooling through O3 (−0.13 W m−2) and CH4 (−0.06 W m−2) and warming through biogenic SOA (+0.09 W m−2), as shown in Fig. 1. The largest single impact of the cropland expansion is through O3. Human deforestation is responsible for substantially lower levels of O3, CH4 and biogenic SOA in the present-day global atmosphere than would exist if the cropland expansion had not occurred. It is well established that, even in the NOx-limited regime, the O3 production efficiency is VOC-dependent. Remarkably, the net atmospheric chemistry effect is a global radiative cooling of −0.11 ± 0.17 W m−2, which is of similar magnitude to the land cover change effects on surface albedo and CO2 compared in Fig. 1.
| http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/v4/n10/full/nclimate2347.html
|