DOI: 10.5194/hess-22-373-2018
Scopus记录号: 2-s2.0-85040792431
论文题名: Participatory flood vulnerability assessment: A multi-criteria approach
作者: De Brito M ; M ; , Evers M ; , Delos Santos Almoradie A
刊名: Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
ISSN: 10275606
出版年: 2018
卷: 22, 期: 1 起始页码: 373
结束页码: 390
语种: 英语
Scopus关键词: Decision making
; Education
; Floods
; Hierarchical systems
; Societies and institutions
; Analytical Hierarchy Process
; Analytical network processes (ANP)
; Flood vulnerabilities
; Multi-criteria approach
; Multi-criteria decision making
; Multi-criteria method
; Participatory approach
; Participatory methods
; Analytic hierarchy process
; assessment method
; decision making
; Delphi analysis
; expert system
; flood
; multicriteria analysis
; participatory approach
; vulnerability
; Brazil
; Brazil
; Estrela
; Rio Grande do Sul
英文摘要: This paper presents a participatory multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach for flood vulnerability assessment while considering the relationships between vulnerability criteria. The applicability of the proposed framework is demonstrated in the municipalities of Lajeado and Estrela, Brazil. The model was co-constructed by 101 experts from governmental organizations, universities, research institutes, NGOs, and private companies. Participatory methods such as the Delphi survey, focus groups, and workshops were applied. A participatory problem structuration, in which the modellers work closely with end users, was used to establish the structure of the vulnerability index. The preferences of each participant regarding the criteria importance were spatially modelled through the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and analytical network process (ANP) multi-criteria methods. Experts were also involved at the end of the modelling exercise for validation. The final product is a set of individual and group flood vulnerability maps. Both AHP and ANP proved to be effective for flood vulnerability assessment; however, ANP is preferred as it considers the dependences among criteria. The participatory approach enabled experts to learn from each other and acknowledge different perspectives towards social learning. The findings highlight that to enhance the credibility and deployment of model results, multiple viewpoints should be integrated without forcing consensus. © Author(s) 2018. Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/79424
Appears in Collections: 气候变化事实与影响
There are no files associated with this item.
作者单位: Department of Geography, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
Recommended Citation:
De Brito M,M,, Evers M,et al. Participatory flood vulnerability assessment: A multi-criteria approach[J]. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences,2018-01-01,22(1)