globalchange  > 气候减缓与适应
DOI: 10.1007/s10584-015-1346-x
Scopus记录号: 2-s2.0-84939942156
论文题名:
How to interpret expert judgment assessments of 21st century sea-level rise
作者: de Vries H.; van de Wal R.S.W.
刊名: Climatic Change
ISSN: 0165-0009
EISSN: 1573-1480
出版年: 2015
卷: 130, 期:2
起始页码: 87
结束页码: 100
语种: 英语
Scopus关键词: Glaciers ; Ice ; Antarctic ice sheets ; Expert elicitation ; Expert judgement ; Expert judgment ; Inter quartile ranges ; Sea level rise ; Sealevel change ; Underlying distribution ; Sea level
英文摘要: In a recent paper Bamber and Aspinall (Nat Clim Change 3:424–427, 2013) (BA13) investigated the sea-level rise that may result from the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets during the 21st century. Using data from an expert judgment elicitation, they obtained a final high-end (P95) value of +84 cm integrated sea-level change from the ice sheets for the 2010–2100 period. However, one key message was left largely undiscussed: The experts had strongly diverging opinions about the ice-sheet contributions to sea-level rise. We argue that such (lack of) consensus should form an essential and integral part of the subsequent analysis of the data. By employing a method that keeps the level of consensus included, and that is also more robust to outliers and less dependent on the choice of the underlying distributions, we obtain on the basis of the same data a considerably lower high-end estimate for the ice-sheet contribution, +53 cm (+38-77 cm interquartile range of “expert consensus”). The method compares favourably with another recent study on expert judgement derived sea-level rise by Horton et al. (Q Sci Rev 84:1–6, 2014). Furthermore we show that the BA13 results are sensitive to a number of assumptions, such as the shape and minimum of the underlying distribution that were not part of the expert elicitation itself. Our analysis therefore demonstrates that one should be careful in considering high-end sea-level rise estimates as being well-determined and fixed numbers. © 2015, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
Citation statistics:
资源类型: 期刊论文
标识符: http://119.78.100.158/handle/2HF3EXSE/84618
Appears in Collections:气候减缓与适应
气候变化事实与影响

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.


作者单位: Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI), De Bilt, Netherlands; Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands

Recommended Citation:
de Vries H.,van de Wal R.S.W.. How to interpret expert judgment assessments of 21st century sea-level rise[J]. Climatic Change,2015-01-01,130(2)
Service
Recommend this item
Sava as my favorate item
Show this item's statistics
Export Endnote File
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[de Vries H.]'s Articles
[van de Wal R.S.W.]'s Articles
百度学术
Similar articles in Baidu Scholar
[de Vries H.]'s Articles
[van de Wal R.S.W.]'s Articles
CSDL cross search
Similar articles in CSDL Cross Search
[de Vries H.]‘s Articles
[van de Wal R.S.W.]‘s Articles
Related Copyright Policies
Null
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

Items in IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.